Discussion about this post

User's avatar
WhyNotThink's avatar

This is a very important post, and maybe fundamental to the operation of our lives and our society.

You start with the introduction that in your native culture, feelings were known to be the rewards and the juice of life, and they are an essential part of living. You also note that the input of your perceptions can jog those feelings, I think you illustrate that by comparison. (Seeing something beautiful might make you feel LESS attractive.) Comparison is a devil.

You delve into the reasons for feelings (there must be one, right?) Finally it comes down to "feeling good" might be the meaning of life? Even though you can get tricked by them. "I could talk about my feelings, but could I really let them in?"

Now we are into a definition. It is that: if emotions are expressed they don't infest the inside with their rot. Put another way, feel the emotion until it dissolves. (I don't say ignore any emotion and I certainly don't say suppress it by force). Understand it and its origin, maybe. Feelings might not have a language, but please look to see if there isn't a language behind them. And of course, the feeling is steering you toward some action. What is that action? Did you choose it among options, or was that the only option available at the time?

Also ask if it really dissipates? Most strong emotions have a long history. They are recurrent, we say all they way back to "childhood trauma". So hasn't that become your favorite watering hole? Now you are going to let it run again, just to "finally have it dissolve". No it is not going to dissolve; what you are doing is re-igniting it. You can ask: why do I love this replay? What do I get out of it? There is a payback.

"Much of the social strife we’re experiencing today results today these meta-feelings". ALL OF IT. It's the stories we listen to and those that we tell and retell. Why do we listen, and why do we spin these yarns? The meaning we construct around them — what we decide is important or unimportant — it comes later.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

"What would it look like if you could dialogue with your feelings as if they were an embodied, physical presence before you? How would you interact with them, and how would it be different? What kind of questions would you ask? What kind of things would you say?

BRILLIANT OBSERVATION.

I am sure you can. Just monitor your self-talk about every occurrence, whether positive or negative. Then ask: what if that is not true? How will I ever find out? You have to try out a different story. You can be the author of your interpretations and your definitions. But only one step at a time. Just change the story a little to see what happens. There is plenty of time for this patience.

.

Expand full comment
Perry J. Greenbaum 🇨🇦 🦜's avatar

Ah, consumer culture, which hooks us in to a particular way of feeling, which is "never enough." I took a photography course long ago, before digital cameras. The prof who worked in advertising, but was critical of it, said "advertising creates a picture of a life you would like to have, but you have to purchase it" Just buy this product.

It sounds absurd on the face of it, but ads work, otherwise companies would stop paying a ton of money to advertise. This is for all products. I ignore all ads, and now buy or consume less. Much less; only what I need. Now, that makes my life better.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts